Back to Dashboard
HR-2317House2026-09-14Public Lands and Natural Resources

Northern Nevada Economic Development and Conservation Act of 2025

YourVoice.Now Summary

EnvironmentTargeted & Unrelated ProvisionsCivil LibertiesTransparency & Accountability

Nearly 29,000 acres of northern Nevada land would go to towns, counties and a tribe — and 148,464 acres would become wilderness.

Environment

New protected wilderness — 148,464 acres in northern Nevada

Eight areas in Douglas and Pershing Counties would join the national wilderness system. Mining and drilling would be barred there, while grazing and hunting go on.

Cleanup costs for cities and counties — on six land transfers

Six transfers say the state, city, county or district taking the land pays every cost of the deal, naming environmental response and restoration. Federal law would still make the government disclose pollution it knows about before handing land over.

Temporary wilderness protection — ends on 49,665 acres

A 1976 law holds these acres as possible wilderness while Congress decides. The bill ends that hold, and ordinary land plans could then allow mining.

Public land in Douglas County — no acre limit on sales

The bill orders a sale of 31.5 acres. It also opens for sale any Douglas County parcel that a federal land plan marks for disposal, with no acre limit set.

Public land planning rules — skipped for these sales and transfers

These choices normally run through a public land planning process. The bill skips that step for most sales here, though a separate law still requires an environmental study.

Carson City's power to pause land sales — removed

A 2009 law let Carson City ask that land be held back from a sale, and the Secretary had to agree. The bill swaps in a two-year deadline to sell, and that right goes away.

Targeted & Unrelated Provisions

Free federal land for Nevada local governments — about 9,700 acres

Douglas County would get 8,861 acres free, Sparks 754 acres, and the state 67 acres at Lake Tahoe. Carson City, Elko, Fernley and Incline Village would pay market value for theirs.

Land ownership for mining claim holders — sale required at market price

Anyone holding a mining claim in Pershing County could offer market value for the land under it. The Interior Department would have to accept, and the buyer would then own the land.

A southern Nevada fund — all money from 16,204 northern acres

Elko, Elko County and Fernley would buy about 16,204 acres at market value. Every dollar would go into a 1998 fund that spends mostly in Clark County.

Land held in trust for the Washoe Tribe — about 2,622 acres

About 2,423 acres of federal land would be held in trust for the Washoe Tribe, plus 199 acres its owners hand over. The land could never be used for tribal gaming.

First chance to buy federal parcels — for next-door landowners

When federal parcels in the Pershing checkerboard go up for bid, the owners next door get the first offer. The government can skip that step if other qualified buyers appear.

Southern Nevada provisions — added to a northern Nevada bill

Title XI covers a power line that runs through seven counties, including Clark County in the south. Title XII gives up federal claims on state land at Jean, south of Las Vegas.

Civil Liberties

Tribal consent for a power line — counted as already given

The Greenlink West power line would cross land set to be held in trust for the Walker River Paiute Tribe. Rules today require the tribe's written consent; the bill counts it as given.

Transparency & Accountability

Public review of land appraisals — 30 days before each sale

Before any Pershing County sale or trade, the final value estimates would be open for public review at the Bureau of Land Management office in Nevada. Notice would go on the agency website and in a Nevada newspaper.

Limits on building a new federal office — no cost cap set

A new federal office complex would take 10 percent of three land sale accounts, with no cost limit. If that falls short, agencies could pull from other Nevada budgets.

More about this bill

If you live in northern Nevada, public land near your town could change hands. Douglas County would get 7,777 acres at no cost, plus 1,084 acres for open space. Sparks would get 754 acres for two parks and a cemetery. Carson City, Elko, Elko County, Fernley and Incline Village would pay market value for theirs. Fernley's share, about 12,085 acres, is the largest single piece. Outside Nevada, most people would notice nothing. The bill would also redraw protection lines. About 148,464 acres in Douglas and Pershing Counties would become wilderness, closed to mining and drilling. One new area would join the existing Cain Mountain Wilderness, bringing it to about 26,389 acres. Grazing and hunting that happen there now would go on. At the same time, 49,665 acres held as possible wilderness would lose that status. More Douglas County land could be sold on top of that. The bill sets no acre limit on those sales. Sales would have to bring at least fair market value. Douglas and Pershing Counties would each keep 10 percent of their sale money. Nevada schools would get 5 percent. Money from the Elko and Fernley sales would work differently: all of it would go to a fund built for southern Nevada. Ten percent of three new accounts would help build a federal office complex, with no cost limit. A town or county taking land would have to pay the cleanup costs that come with the deal. Two titles reach outside northern Nevada. One would treat the Walker River Paiute Tribe as having consented to a power line across land held in trust for it. The tribe would still be paid and would still negotiate terms, but could not refuse. The other would give up federal claims on state land at Jean, south of Las Vegas, for a proposed airport. In Pershing County, people holding mining claims could buy the federal land under them at market value. The Interior Department would have to sell. Other Pershing sales would carry the minerals under the land. The official value estimates would be open to the public 30 days before each sale.

Congressional Summary

Congress's official summary of this bill still describes an earlier version of the text, so we have left it out here. You can read it on Congress.gov.

Congress.gov →

Legislative Subjects

Bank accounts, deposits, capitalCongressional oversightEconomic developmentFloods and storm protectionGeography and mappingGovernment buildings, facilities, and propertyHousing and community development fundingIndian lands and resources rightsLakes and riversLand transfersLand use and conservationNevadaParks, recreation areas, trailsWater resources fundingWilderness and natural areas, wildlife refuges, wild rivers, habitats

Details

Congress
119th
Chamber
House
Status
summarized
Action
Passed House
Action Date
2026-09-14
Date Added
2026-09-09
Source
Congress.gov →

Like reading a bill in plain English?

We're building an app that does this for every bill in Congress and lets you tell your reps how you want them to vote. We're a small team getting ready to launch, and we're trying to show investors that real people want this. Be one of them. Help us get it built. Leave your email and we'll tell you the moment the app is ready.

By default, we'll only email you once — when the app launches. Unless you opt in below, you won't receive anything else. We don't share or sell your email.