Back to Dashboard
HR-2675House2026-06-15Law

Protecting Our Courts from Foreign Manipulation Act

YourVoice.Now Summary

Civil LibertiesTransparency & Accountability

Most people would notice nothing — but foreign government money could no longer pay for a U.S. lawsuit.

Civil Liberties

Ways to pay for a lawsuit — foreign government money banned

Investors can pay for someone else's lawsuit and take a cut of the winnings. A foreign government, or a fund it owns, could not be that source of money. Paying through a middleman would not be allowed either.

Court access for foreign-funded lawsuits — cases dismissed for good

If a court found banned foreign money in a case, the case would be dismissed with prejudice. That means it could not be filed again. The text sets out no exception for a plaintiff who did not know where the money came from.

Finality of lawsuits already decided — judgments can be reopened

A case that already ended could be reopened. The losing side could ask the judge to undo the result, using the court rule for fraud.

Privacy for foreign backers of lawsuits — names sent to Justice Department

The filing would list each foreign backer's name, address, and home country. The Attorney General would get a copy. So would a Justice Department team that works on national security.

Transparency & Accountability

Disclosure of outside money behind lawsuits — required in every funded case

In any federal case with outside funding, a party or their lawyer would sign a sworn statement. It would say where the money came from, under penalty of perjury. The funding papers would also go to the judge and the other side, unless the judge ruled otherwise. Funders based only in the United States would not be named.

Yearly report on foreign lawsuit money — amounts and countries listed

The first report would be due within a year, then one each year after. It would go to the Judiciary Committees in the House and Senate. It would estimate how much foreign money paid for lawsuits, country by country, and name the courts.

More about this bill

Most people would notice nothing in daily life. The change would land on people and businesses already in a federal lawsuit that someone else helps pay for. Outside investors sometimes fund lawsuits in exchange for a share of any payout. Under this bill, money from a foreign government or its investment fund could not be used that way. A case that used such money would be thrown out for good. Every party in a funded case would file a sworn statement about who is behind the money. It would go to the judge, the other side, and the Justice Department. The deadline would be 30 days after the funding starts, or the day the case is filed, whichever comes later. The rules would apply in federal courts only. They would start as soon as the bill became law. Lawsuits already in progress would be covered too.

Congressional Summary

Protecting Our Courts from Foreign Manipulation Act This bill limits third-party financing of civil litigation by foreign entities in federal courts and establishes related disclosure requirements. The bill makes it unlawful for a foreign state or sovereign wealth fund to provide any monetary support for a civil action in which it is not a named party. The bill also makes it unlawful for any party or counsel to receive monetary support for civil litigation from a foreign state or sovereign wealth fund that is not a party. The bill also prohibits third-party litigation funding agreements involving money from a foreign state or sovereign wealth fund in which someone other than named parties or counsel of record receives a payment that is contingent on the outcome or proceeds from the civil action or from any matter within a portfolio that includes the civil action. The bill requires any party or counsel in a civil action to disclose the name of any foreign person, state, or sovereign wealth fund that has agreed to provide monetary support for the civil action, has a right to receive a payment contingent upon the outcome of the civil action, or has the right to receive payment that is contingent on proceeds from any matter within a portfolio that includes the civil action. The bill also requires parties to produce the agreement creating a contingent right to payment. These requirements apply to claims that are pending on or commenced after this bill's date of enactment.

Legislative Subjects

Civil actions and liabilityCongressional oversightForeign and international bankingJudicial procedure and administration

Details

Congress
119th
Chamber
House
Status
summarized
Action
Reported to House
Action Date
2026-06-15
Date Added
2026-09-18
Source
Congress.gov →

Like reading a bill in plain English?

We're building an app that does this for every bill in Congress and lets you tell your reps how you want them to vote. We're a small team getting ready to launch, and we're trying to show investors that real people want this. Be one of them. Help us get it built. Leave your email and we'll tell you the moment the app is ready.

By default, we'll only email you once — when the app launches. Unless you opt in below, you won't receive anything else. We don't share or sell your email.