YourVoice.Now Summary
Civil LibertiesTransparency & AccountabilityAverage Household ImpactIndependent 15-member commissions would draw US House maps in every state — with partisan gerrymandering banned outright.
Civil Liberties
- Partisan fairness requirement — Maps may not favor a party by intent or by effect
- Voting Rights Act compliance — Elevated to a mandatory ranked redistricting criterion
- Minority ability to elect — Protected even where the group is not a district majority
- Private right of action — Any citizen may sue over a state's redistricting failures
Transparency & Accountability
- State legislature control of maps — Map-drawing moved to independent commissions
- Public meetings — Commission proceedings open, with public comment and map submissions
- Independent website — Commission site may not be run by any elected official's office
- Mid-decade redistricting ban — New maps blocked until the next census absent a court order
- GAO reporting — Comptroller General must report on commission membership diversity
Average Household Impact
- Federal payments to states — $150,000 per House seat to run the commission process
The details
Congressional district maps would be drawn by independent commissions instead of state legislatures. Every state with more than one House seat would set up a 15-member commission. Five members come from the largest party, five from the second largest, and five from neither. A nonpartisan state agency picks the first six at random in a public meeting. Those six then choose the remaining nine, and each pick needs at least one vote from all three groups. Maps would have to satisfy ranked criteria in a fixed order. Equal population under the Constitution comes first, then the Voting Rights Act, including coalition districts. Third is protecting a minority group's practical ability to elect its candidate of choice. That applies even where the group is not a majority of the district. Communities of interest come fourth — neighborhoods tied by shared economic, cultural, geographic, or historic bonds. Shared party or candidate loyalty explicitly does not count as a community of interest. Partisan gerrymandering would be barred by intent or by effect. Courts would judge effect using computer modeling of the last eight years of statewide federal elections. They would compare a challenged map against alternative maps meeting the same rules. Mid-decade redistricting would also be blocked until the next census, unless a court orders it. All commission meetings would be public, on a website no elected official controls. If a state misses its deadline, any citizen can sue and a three-judge federal court draws the map. The Election Assistance Commission would pay states $150,000 per House seat to run the process. The Attorney General and private citizens could both sue to enforce the rules. State and local district lines are untouched. Everything takes effect with the 2030 census, except the mid-decade ban.
Congressional Summary
Redistricting Reform Act of 2025This bill sets forth requirements for congressional redistricting and generally prohibits mid-decade redistricting.Specifically, the bill requires that congressional redistricting be conducted in accordance with a plan developed by (1) a state-established independent commission; or (2) if such a commission does not enact a plan, a three-judge panel from a U.S. District Court. This requirement does not apply to a state that has a plan developed and approved by an independent redistricting commission that complies with specified requirements.The bill outlines the criteria for a redistricting plan, including that congressional districts must be drawn to (1) ensure the practical ability of a protected group to participate in the political process, nominate candidates, and elect representatives of choice; and (2) represent communities of interest and neighborhoods.Additionally, the bill prohibits the use of a redistricting plan that was drawn with the intent (or has the effect of) materially favoring or disfavoring any political party.Further, the bill establishes the requirements for appointing members to a state-established independent redistricting commission, including diversity requirements. The Government Accountability Office must report on the extent to which these commissions meet the diversity requirements.The bill includes a provision to prevent states from redistricting more than once following an apportionment (i.e., mid-decade redistricting).The bill also directs the Election Assistance Commission to make payments to states to carry out congressional redistricting.
Details
- Congress
- 119th
- Chamber
- House
- Status
- summarized
- Action
- Introduced in House
- Action Date
- 2025-09-18
- Date Added
- 2026-07-24
- Source
- Congress.gov →
Like reading a bill in plain English?
We're building an app that does this for every bill in Congress and lets you tell your reps how you want them to vote. We're a small team getting ready to launch, and we're trying to show investors that real people want this. Be one of them. Help us get it built. Leave your email and we'll tell you the moment the app is ready.