Back to Dashboard
HR-9497House2026-09-16Water Resources Development

Water Resources Development Act of 2026

YourVoice.Now Summary

Your MoneyEnvironmentTransparency & AccountabilityTargeted & Unrelated Provisions

Would clear $19.8 billion in Army Corps water work and 195 named local water and sewer fixes — but send no cash.

Your Money

Private structures allowed on federal lakefront land — Table Rock Lake

At Table Rock Lake in Missouri and Arkansas, some homes, sheds, decks, fences and septic tanks already sit on Corps land. Section 231 says the Corps must let each one stay. A tank must go only when a local government orders it replaced.

Environment

Flood control law's reach — sea level rise and stormwater added

Section 132 adds sea level rise, tides, sinking land and stormwater to the 1936 flood control law. It also tells the Corps to adopt a broader local flood plan when it finds one workable.

Grants to fix unsafe dams — extended through 2031

FEMA grants help states fix or remove dams the state rates high hazard and finds unsafe. The $60 million a year runs out after 2026; the bill extends it to 2031.

Yearly drought and water storage money — $130 million to $35 million

The program could pay for more kinds of drought work, from saving water to refilling groundwater. But the most one project can get in federal money would fall from $65 million to $10 million.

Missouri River water leaving the basin — ten governors must agree

Missouri River water could not be piped outside the ten basin states unless all ten governors sign off. The Army could not even study such a move.

Army Corps' Superfund liability when cleaning up polluted mud

The Corps could not be sued under Superfund for waste it stirs up while cleaning river or harbor mud. The EPA must sign off on the plan first. The engrossed text adds that polluters can still be sued, and so can anyone who does this work carelessly.

Federal backing for 33 Los Angeles County flood channels

Thirty-three flood channels in Los Angeles County would lose their federal project status. Three stretches of the Los Angeles River are on the list. The county already runs them.

Case-by-case review for minor work on Corps levees and channels

Today anyone altering a Corps levee, channel or dam must ask permission one job at a time. Section 105 tells the Corps to write blanket approvals for groups of similar jobs that cause only small harm. Draft rules would be open for public comment for at least 30 days.

Transparency & Accountability

Harbor upkeep money that must be spent each year

Shippers pay a tax for harbor upkeep. Section 113 removes the wording that let the Army spend less than the full yearly amount. It adds a yearly report to Congress.

Public list of wildlife habitat the Corps owes

For each project the Corps would post online what habitat it must replace, where, when, and how much is left. The list must be kept current.

Corps study cost and time caps — replaced by a public report

A Corps study is now supposed to end within 4 years and cost under $5 million. Those limits and the required warnings to Congress would go. A yearly public report replaces them.

Conflict-of-interest rules for a new levee advisory board

Section 104 sets up an eleven-member Levee Owners Board. Members own and run federal levees. They would advise the Army and Congress on levee money and safety. The bill says they are not government employees for ethics rules. So the federal conflict-of-interest rules would not reach them.

Targeted & Unrelated Provisions

Named local water projects — 195 new ones added

Section 307 names 195 city and county water and sewer projects in 31 states and Puerto Rico. They add up to $3.7 billion. The smallest is $60,000; the biggest is $155 million.

Land swap for one named company — 79 acres

The government would give up its easement rights on about 79.6 acres in Bay and Walton Counties, Florida, to The St. Joe Company. The company gives back 103.5 acres and pays the difference in value.

Easier repayment for one Colorado water pipeline — 75 years

The House added Section 318 on the floor, after the committee print. Local districts building the Arkansas Valley Conduit would still owe 35 percent of its cost. But they could repay over up to 75 years, at half the Treasury interest rate, if they show hardship. The pipeline is meant to bring drinking water to Colorado towns that lack a reliable supply.

More about this bill

Whether this bill reaches you depends on whether the Army Corps of Engineers works near your town. It would clear the Corps to start projects at hundreds of named towns, rivers, ports and lakes. It would hand over no money. Every dollar in it is a ceiling that Congress must still fill in a later spending bill. Fourteen new construction projects would be approved, at $19.8 billion in total cost. The largest by far is $12.3 billion for Everglades restoration in Florida. Federal and local money would split that cost evenly. Two river locks, one in Kentucky and one in Tennessee, add $4.3 billion. Local partners would pay part of most of these projects. The bill would also add 195 new water and sewer authorizations for named cities and counties. They cover 31 states and Puerto Rico and come to $3.7 billion. It would raise the dollar limits on 83 local projects already approved. Another 133 studies would be approved for specific places. This is where you are most likely to find your own town. Some long-standing rules would change. The 4-year and $5 million limits on Corps planning studies would go away. A yearly public report would replace them. The small water storage program would be renamed for drought and given a wider job. But its yearly limit would drop from $130 million to $35 million. Federal grants that help states fix unsafe dams run out after 2026. The bill would keep them going through 2031. The House added one section on the floor. It would let southeastern Colorado water districts repay a drinking-water pipeline over up to 75 years.

Congressional Summary

Congress's official summary of this bill still describes an earlier version of the text, so we have left it out here. You can read it on Congress.gov.

Congress.gov →

Legislative Subjects

Administrative law and regulatory proceduresAdvisory bodiesAlabamaAlaskaAlternative and renewable resourcesAquatic ecologyArizonaArkansasArmy Corps of EngineersAtmospheric science and weatherCaliforniaCaribbean areaColoradoComputers and information technologyCongressional oversightConnecticutDams and canalsDelawareDistrict of Columbia

Details

Congress
119th
Chamber
House
Status
summarized
Action
Passed House
Action Date
2026-09-16
Date Added
2026-09-09
Source
Congress.gov →

Like reading a bill in plain English?

We're building an app that does this for every bill in Congress and lets you tell your reps how you want them to vote. We're a small team getting ready to launch, and we're trying to show investors that real people want this. Be one of them. Help us get it built. Leave your email and we'll tell you the moment the app is ready.

By default, we'll only email you once — when the app launches. Unless you opt in below, you won't receive anything else. We don't share or sell your email.