YourVoice.Now Summary
Your MoneyCorporate BenefitsTransparency & AccountabilitySets up a House vote on honey purity rules — imports would be lab-tested, blends labeled by country.
Your Money
Federal health officials would have to write one legal definition of honey. It would cap moisture, heat damage, and added sugars, and is due 180 days after the law takes effect.
A jar mixing honey from several countries would list each one, biggest share first. That list goes on the front label or inside a bordered box you can spot.
Imported honey that fails the standard could not be resold as bakery syrup or any other food ingredient. The owner would have 90 days to ship it back out, or it would be destroyed at their cost.
Corporate Benefits
Only honey importers and big packers of foreign honey would pay the fees that fund this program. If a company handles just U.S. honey, it owes nothing.
Honey grown and packed here would count as meeting the standard if USDA checks the producer. Those batches would skip lab tests, unless that producer also handles foreign honey.
A new panel would help write the honey rules, with seats for land-grant university experts and the two biggest U.S. beekeeper groups. No one whose main trade is foreign honey may serve.
U.S. honey that is pure but fails on quality, such as heat damage, could be sold for animal feed or baking. Imported honey that fails gets no such option.
An importer or packer whose shipment fails a test could ask for one more test. It must be run by a separate approved U.S. lab, at the owner's expense.
Test results from foreign labs or foreign governments could not prove that a shipment meets the standard, even at the border. Imported honey would have to be sampled and tested at an approved U.S. lab.
Transparency & Accountability
A public online list would show every proven break of the honey rules. It would name the importers, packers, foreign sellers, and brands involved.
Importers, blenders, and packers would have to keep records showing how much real honey they bought. Selling more honey than they can account for would show up in those books.
Passing this resolution would swap in the honey act as the new bill text, with no separate vote on that swap. It also blocks floor objections and holds debate to one hour.
More about this bill
If you buy honey, this could change what the label must tell you. The resolution sets the House debate terms for H.R. 2162, the Honey Integrity and Consumer Transparency Act. It also treats a full replacement text of that bill as already adopted. Members would get one hour of debate and one chance to send the bill back to committee. That replacement text would make federal health officials write a binding purity standard for honey within 180 days. The standard would set limits on moisture, heat damage, and added sugars. Imported honey would have to be tested at a U.S. lab. Importers would pay the program's costs. Honey grown and packed in this country would skip that testing. Those producers would owe no program fees. Labels on blended honey would name every country supplying 5 percent or more. A public registry would list companies caught breaking the rules. None of this takes effect unless the bill passes both chambers and is signed into law.
Congressional Summary
This resolution provides for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 2162) to provide for the protection of the integrity of honey marketed in the United States, and for other purposes.
Details
- Congress
- 119th
- Chamber
- House
- Status
- summarized
- Action
- Introduced in House
- Action Date
- 2026-06-30
- Date Added
- 2026-07-10
- Source
- Congress.gov →
Like reading a bill in plain English?
We're building an app that does this for every bill in Congress and lets you tell your reps how you want them to vote. We're a small team getting ready to launch, and we're trying to show investors that real people want this. Be one of them. Help us get it built. Leave your email and we'll tell you the moment the app is ready.