YourVoice.Now Summary
Civil LibertiesCriminal Justice & Due ProcessTransparency & AccountabilityVictims, state prosecutors, and Members of Congress could sue the Attorney General over withheld Epstein files.
Civil Liberties
- Victim access to records — Victims may request their own unredacted files on demand
- Victim civil-suit rights — Victims gain standing to sue over withheld or redacted records
- Privacy protections for other victims — Identifying details of other victims may still be redacted
Criminal Justice & Due Process
- Penalties for concealing records — Existing obstruction and false-statement charges made applicable
- State prosecutor access — State officers get unredacted records for active investigations
- Touhy regulation requirements — Justice Department rules on state access no longer apply
Transparency & Accountability
- Enforcement rights — States, victims, and Members of Congress could sue the Attorney General
- Privilege claims — Common-law privileges barred as grounds to withhold covered records
- Congressional access — Any Member must receive unredacted records within seven days
- Permitted withholdings — One category of allowed redaction removed from the underlying Act
- Justification requirement — Each redaction separately must carry a written justification
The details
A House floor rule would carry a rewritten version of H.R. 185 straight to a vote. The rule waives points of order, treats a substitute amendment as already adopted, and allows one hour of debate. The substitute replaces the bill's entire text with the "Epstein Files Transparency Act II." The Clerk would have to notify the Senate of passage within one calendar day. The substitute adds enforcement provisions to the Epstein Files Transparency Act, enacted last year as Public Law 119-38. State attorneys general, district attorneys, and victims could sue the U.S. Attorney General over records that are withheld, redacted, or delayed. Courts would have to move those cases quickly and could award damages, costs, and attorney's fees. Any Member of Congress could demand unredacted records and would have to receive them within seven days. A Member could sue if that deadline passes or the written justification is false or misleading. Victims could request their own complete, unredacted files, including FBI interview reports. Details identifying other victims could still be redacted. The Justice Department could no longer cite deliberative process, attorney-client, or law enforcement privilege to hold covered records back. One category of permitted redaction is removed from the underlying law. Each redaction, rather than the set as a whole, would need its own written justification. Officials who conceal, destroy, or misrepresent covered records would face existing federal obstruction and false-statement charges.
Congressional Summary
This resolution provides for the consideration of the bill (H.R.185) to advance responsible policies.
Details
- Congress
- 119th
- Chamber
- House
- Status
- summarized
- Action
- Introduced in House
- Action Date
- 2026-07-15
- Date Added
- 2026-07-25
- Source
- Congress.gov →
Like reading a bill in plain English?
We're building an app that does this for every bill in Congress and lets you tell your reps how you want them to vote. We're a small team getting ready to launch, and we're trying to show investors that real people want this. Be one of them. Help us get it built. Leave your email and we'll tell you the moment the app is ready.