YourVoice.Now Summary
Corporate BenefitsAverage Household ImpactTransparency & AccountabilityTariff-dodging by moving production to a third country could trigger a matching US duty on Chinese-linked firms.
Corporate Benefits
- Tariff exposure for foreign-linked producers — Third-country plants could face matching duties
- Ownership threshold for coverage — A 25% nonmarket-economy stake brings a company in scope
Average Household Impact
- Tariffs on covered third-country goods — New duties would apply to affected imports
Transparency & Accountability
- Congressional justification — Trade Representative must explain any decision not to act
- Inquiry deadlines — 45 days to open an inquiry, 180 days to determine evasion
The details
Companies tied to countries like China could not dodge US tariffs by shifting production abroad. The Trade Representative could investigate any such move to a third country. If the plant exists mainly to avoid tariffs, the agency could impose a matching duty. That new duty must be at least as large as the tariff being avoided. A company counts as covered if a nonmarket economy country owns or controls it. A 25% equity stake is enough, including stakes held through joint ventures or derivatives. Inquiries could start at the agency's own initiative, or at the request of Congress or affected businesses. The agency would have 45 days to decide whether to open an inquiry. It would then have 180 days to reach a finding. If it declines to act, it must tell Congress why, including the economic effects of doing nothing.
Congressional Summary
Axing Nonmarket Tariff Evasion Act or the ANTE ActThis bill authorizes the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) to investigate and take remedial action against covered entities that evade or attempt to evade duties (i.e., tariffs) that were imposed on nonmarket economy countries (e.g., China) by investing in other countries.Under the bill, a covered entity (e.g., business) (1) is owned, controlled, subject to the jurisdiction or direction of, or operated by a nonmarket economy country; and (2) includes an entity for which, on any date during the most recent 12-month period, at least 25% of the equity interests in such entity were held directly or indirectly by one or more entities organized under the laws of a nonmarket economy country.Currently, Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 allows the USTR to impose tariffs in response to actions by foreign countries that violate U.S. rights under international trade agreements or that burden or restrict U.S. commerce in unjustifiable, unreasonable, or discriminatory ways. In 2018, for example, the USTR used Section 301 to impose tariffs on many imports from China.This bill allows the USTR to investigate whether a covered entity is establishing or has established investments (e.g., manufacturing operations) in another country that is not subject to Section 301 tariffs in order to evade those tariffs. Upon an affirmative determination, the USTR may impose certain remedial measures, such as imposing a tariff equivalent to the original tariff on goods associated with the nonmarket economy country.
Details
- Congress
- 119th
- Chamber
- Senate
- Status
- summarized
- Action
- Introduced in Senate
- Action Date
- 2025-05-22
- Date Added
- 2026-07-23
- Source
- Congress.gov →
Like reading a bill in plain English?
We're building an app that does this for every bill in Congress and lets you tell your reps how you want them to vote. We're a small team getting ready to launch, and we're trying to show investors that real people want this. Be one of them. Help us get it built. Leave your email and we'll tell you the moment the app is ready.